点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
古城绛州：淡雅墨香里的浓浓年味******
(新春走基层)古城绛州：淡雅墨香里的浓浓年味
中新网运城1月12日电 题：古城绛州：淡雅墨香里的浓浓年味
中新网记者 陆祁国
“虎步腾云追绮梦，兔毫泼墨绘宏图。”看到自己中意的这副春联书写完毕，在一旁等候的居民高兴得合不拢嘴。
诗词楹联学会会员原创春联，民众点选心仪的春联，书法艺术家现场挥毫。1月12日，山西运城新绛县龙兴广场，淡雅的墨香里透出浓浓的年味。
春联是中华民族独具特色的传统文化，写春联、贴春联不仅是一种民俗活动，更是赓续文化血脉、回味乡音乡愁的难忘符号。组织书法艺术家走上街头、走进村庄现场书写原创春联并免费赠送，是新绛县延续多年的文化惠民活动之一。
此前一天，“2023‘绛州古城中国年’写春联、送春联活动”正式启动。
“香透窗纱花映翠，人居福地寿延年”“绿染春光春染绿，歌飞岁首岁飞歌”……12日上午，新绛县诗词楹联学会会员周长胜原创的多副春联不时被民众“相中”。
84岁的周长胜系新绛县诗词楹联学会“元老”。为民众书写春联超过50年的他，至今仍坚持每年创作春联、书写春联。有时，他会专程前往距离县城几十里外的村庄为村民书写春联。
39岁的刘建国同系新绛县诗词楹联学会会员，自幼喜好书法。平时，但凡有人找他书写春联，无论工作多忙他都尽量满足。
青年志愿者走进农村发放春联。 陆祁国 摄起初，刘建国不会编撰春联，只能抄一些现成的内容。时间长了，他意识到一个问题：春联内容不能年年都是“涛声依旧”。如是，他对编撰春联产生兴趣。
“刚开始只是自己摸索，后来有幸得到(新绛县)诗词楹联学会老师指导，懂得了春联的平仄关系。”近年来，刘建国书写的原创春联受到很多人喜欢。
无联不成春，有联春更浓。新绛县诗词楹联学会会长朱青龙说，春联承载着民众对节日的祝福、对美好生活的向往，内容需要与时俱进，这是该学会多年来坚持原创春联的主要原因。
“今年，我们在原创春联中精选了169副，供民众点选。”新绛县文联主席兰秀艳介绍，这些春联的内容紧扣时代主题，既展现新绛历史文化底蕴，又立意高远、充满正能量，突出喜庆祥和春节气氛。
12日10时许，新绛县泉掌镇新庄村，新绛县委宣传部、共青团新绛县委组织的送春联活动同步进行。青年志愿者忙着把春联装进手提袋，村民排队领取。
79岁的村民卫建林系第四届运城助人为乐道德模范提名奖获得者，多年来坚持为村民免费书写春联。看到志愿者送来春联以及其他慰问品，老人非常高兴：“以前我给别人写，现在别人给我写，这个活动传承得很好。”
同日，一批装有绛州木版年画、福兔、福字、门画、窗花、春联的春节文化大礼包，也在派送中。
新绛县委常委、宣传部部长吴宏伟介绍，写春联、送春联活动将持续10天。其间，书法艺术家、青年志愿者将分头走进老城、新城、社区、农村送祝福、增年味。
2014年，新绛县荣膺“中国最佳楹联文化县”称号，“国字号”楹联文化品牌成为绛州古城靓丽的文化名片。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)